CJI Ranjan Gogoi gets clean chit in sexual harassment case, woman complainant said she was 'highly disappointed and dejected' Abhishek Tripathi Legal Updates Tue, May 07, 2019, at ,12:05 PM The In House Committee which investigated the sexual harassment allegation against the Chief Justice of India gave clean chit to CJI Ranjan Gogoi. Last month an Ex-Employee of Supreme Court raised a sexual harassment allegation against CJI. The in house probe panel of Justice SA Bobde, Justices Indira Banerjee and Justice Indu Malhotra found no substance in the allegations contained in the complaint of the former employee of the Supreme Court. Referring to Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India, the committee said that the report of committee constituted as a part of the in-House procedure is not liable to be made public. In accordance with In-House procedure, the report dated 5 May 2019 has been submitted to next senior Judge competent to receive the report and also to the CJI, the Secretary General said in a press release. In response to the clean-chit given to CJI Ranjan Gogoi by the in-house panel in the sexual harassment allegations, the woman complainant in a press release said that she was 'highly disappointed and dejected'. In her statement to the press she added "I am now extremely scared and terrified because the In- House Committee, despite having all material placed before them, has given me no justice or protection and said nothing about the absolutely malafide dismissals and suspensions, indignities and humiliations suffered by me and my family. I and my family members remain vulnerable to the ongoing reprisals and attack". "Today, my worst fears have come true, and all hope of justice and redress from the highest Court of the land have been shattered. In fact the Committee has announced that I will not even be provided a copy of the Report, and so I have no way of comprehending the reasons and basis for the summary dismissal of my Complaint of sexual harassment and victimisation", she further added. After the first three hearings the complainant was not part of the in house inquiry. She refused to participate in inquiry as she was not seeing justice happening.